Three times now. THREE TIMES! I have failed this test. You’d think a quick girl like me would learn.I think the boys who asked me this must have read that first post where I make fun of the dating question, “So what’s your favorite music /artist?” (click the links to read that post) So now they have a new getting-to-know-you question. I’m not making fun of it. It’s a good question. But just like the other question on what music do you listen too… it’s a test. And THAT’s what I’m about to make fun of. They Say its not a test, but it is my fellow daters. THIS IS a test. Its name sounds innocent, watch out, cuz this could make or break your reputation in religious Utah County.
So it goes like this….
Tester sets up the scenario and says:
So you’ve only got three. And whatever these people represent is suppose to tell them who you really are. The tester will explain that you’ll go back and forth, one at a time as you tell your three invites. And you may say,“Let’s say you’re having a tea party and you can invite any three people in the
world- future , past or present, dead or alive. Who would you invite? And why?”
“Well you go first.” But that doesn’t’ work. The tester must go AFTER you. Timing is crucial. You’ll see why.
So I have the following people that I pick from, sometimes switching it up for variety but they usually all represent the same things I’m trying to portray to the tester. They are:
Gandhi, Mother Teresa, Mark Twain, Einstein, Bill Cosby, and The guitarist from Swing Kids – had a pie crust crush on’em because of his moral strength and ability to play guitar with only three fingers. YES, I wanted to be his girlfriend.
So he says his second choice, like The Beatles or something for his ‘I’m cool in the 60’s sort of way’ and my third turn is approaching.
I’ve already thrown out Gandhi which proves I’m not racist, I’m aware of past world events, a political, philosophical thinker and supporter of world peace. Check check and check. Is the guy falling in love with me yet?! Right, I know. My second was Mark Twain because I too would love to have witty conversation and get writing tips while Gandhi tells us his story.
Tester: “Okay, your turn!” (Oh I just love turns, thank you. ) “Who is gonna be your last invite?”
Test Flunker says (that’s me): “BILL COSBY!” which once again shows that I am not racist despite my Ebonics blog title and that I appreciate wise people who also value comedic timing.
He’s pleased as punch. But not because he thinks I’m funny and purely unracist. He‘s laughing at how well I have set up his own last invite.
I’ve already thrown out Gandhi which proves I’m not racist, I’m aware of past world events, a political, philosophical thinker and supporter of world peace. Check check and check. Is the guy falling in love with me yet?! Right, I know. My second was Mark Twain because I too would love to have witty conversation and get writing tips while Gandhi tells us his story.
Tester: “Okay, your turn!” (Oh I just love turns, thank you. ) “Who is gonna be your last invite?”
Test Flunker says (that’s me): “BILL COSBY!” which once again shows that I am not racist despite my Ebonics blog title and that I appreciate wise people who also value comedic timing.
He’s pleased as punch. But not because he thinks I’m funny and purely unracist. He‘s laughing at how well I have set up his own last invite.
Tester: “k, you ready for mine?” with that smug look.
Failer thinking: ‘No, but go ahead you trickster.’
Tester: “Jesus.”
'Great! Now I’m not religious! And it’s even Christmas time!' Ope! We have a winner.
Failer says: “But wait, no, I need to take one back!" Laughing as though that one just seem to slip my mind. Whoops.
Trickster Tester Says: “Nope, nuh uh. You had your three. You’re exclusive invitations have been sent.”
Hang your head in shame and try to explain how you forgot about that very most important person.
How do I explain my short coming? Its because the “Why part of this test” lays the ground for an emotional moment for me if I were to choose the Savior. Do you want me to say, “The Savior, Jesus Christ because….” And then weep in front of you? I’m not going to do that at Chilis!
But instead, the tea party tables are turned when,
Witty girl says: “Um, are you Mormon? Or does that HUGE CTR ring on your ring finger stand for “CLICK-through-rate” because you work at Omniture?! Cuz if I were you, I would not invite the Savior to a TEA party. And you did not specify DECAFE. NO NO! TOO LATE! My test results are proven. Take me home now you hypocrite. Can I getta Smatchoo please?!















11 comments:
i hate these tests! one conversation cannot be so illuminating as to describe your whole personality. if it can, you suck as a person and are boring.
thank you hannah, as always you have perfectly articulated something screwy about our society!
One time I went on a date where I swear the guy had a paper he was reading questions from. I felt like I was on a job interview... and that I didn't get the job. Dating sucks!
www.xatrix.tk omg what the... let-s ta ke a loook www.xatrix.tk
www.xatrix.tk omg what the... let-s ta ke a loook www.xatrix.tk
Hannah you have got to be the coolest person ever. I completely agree with Holly in that you have so beautifully articulated and all too common practice in dating, a practice that I think we should abandon unless of course you win the game in the end! : )
Dating != job interview.
Dating != contest.
Dating ?= relaxing time with best friend
That's the point, after all; find the one you'd like to spend time and eternity with. If it's a contest from the starting line, what happens 100 yards in?
Less obliquely, this sort of "quiz" tells me less about the answerer and more about the questioner... and it has little to do with the quiz itself. ;)
Wow, I'm glad I missed out on Tests during my date (or lack thereof) years.
I have another comeback. Say, "Jesus? But I already know Him!"
And I know it's not original, but I say: Jane Austen, Claude Monet, and John Lennon.
P.S. I hope you don't mind, but I found your witty blog when I saw that you also follow Rich's (he's my cousin).
to those frustrated lady commenters,
let me give you just a bit of advice.
first, if a guy opens with anything close to "i'd invite jesus to my tea party" there's obviously an issue. i'm an accepting, forward thinker, but unless this guy lives in london, tea parties are for 5 y/o girls.
second, thinking of clever things to talk about with a girl obviously more attractive than you is hard enough. so cut the guy a little slack and be flattered that he is interested in you. he could have given up and never said anything.
finally, be honest with yourself. at this point you're probably so frustrated with the provo dating scene that you go into most dates actively searching for things to rip the guy about. i mean he could look like beckham (oh wait you're in Utah so think of that boy/man from Twilight), have his career together, and be a nice guy. but since he makes a dumb, ice breaker comment he's done.
here comes the whole "women are like apples" analogy right? you deserve the best and shouldn't settle for less.
good for you. stick to it. just make sure you don't miss some of the best climbers along the way.
seacrest out.
Only in provo...
I have something to say about the "Tea Party Test" (http://richsanders.blogspot.com/)
you sure know how to say it! why can't people just talk and be comfortable with each other? men, try just being yourself for once and see how that works out. you'd be surprised.
Rich, Provo hardly has a lock on idiotic behavior. Pigeonholing a community based on caricature and prejudice isn't conducive to learning anything... but it sure makes it easier to see yourself as being right. *shrug*
Post a Comment